NOTE: I will be breaking up my essay on this matter in a series of separate posts that will go up over the course of the next few weeks. Enjoy.
Introduction
Electoral politics in contemporary American society are usually a drab spectacle to observe. The homogenized corporate banality of our two-party system almost beckons most citizens to maintain a comfortable distance from it. To the extent that most Americans are obliged to engage in the political process at all, it is typically in the role of the citizen-consumer — passively choosing between one of two ‘viable’ representatives, who have undergone a thorough process of political commodification.
In lieu of the traditional structural trappings of civic participation in the electoral process, influential ideological apparatuses play an increasingly important role in perpetuating the myth of self-governance in bourgeois democracies. The corporate media, for example, is adept at appealing to the proclivities and dispositions of millions of citizens. As such, its focus on such things as the pageantry of the electoral process, the logistical components of the campaigns, and the personalities of the candidates, is able to cultivate an identification with the political process that serves to obscure its utterly farcical nature.
Despite the complacency of large segments of the American public, disruptions in social accord still manage to find political expression in ways that challenge the status quo. The character of these political tendencies are themselves based on complex interactions between material and ideological forces that challenge the way in which said tendencies engage other political phenomena and ultimately govern their own emancipatory potential.